Friday, 6 March 2015

Trout Wry Face, Unmoving Eyebrows and Awry Smile: Cosmetic Surgery Claims

The number of patients shifting to cosmetic surgery treatments and non-surgical ones in the U.K has grown to a greater extent in recent years. They now have to pay more money than before on rising varieties of surgical or non-surgical beauty and cosmetic treatments.


In an attempt to get more and more beautiful appearance and figure, a total of 43,174 cosmetic surgical treatments were performed in 2012 in accordance with a study by the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (BAAPS). On the other hand, seeing that number of cosmetic surgical claims is a change resulting in an increase, in an unfortunate way; therefore do the suffered ones of complicated conditions requiring secondary surgery. 

These assessments only show surgical treatments and do not show the big rise in complicated cases with non-surgical “teatime” plastic treatments, for instance injectable Botox fillers that are taken by injection to full up lips and other facial skin parts.

Supposed “non-invasive beauty treatments” are regulated a little bit and there is not any quick fix if something fail and a patient can be remained without assistance. At this moment in time, any person can apply filler’s injection to a patient’s face after getting a training of just a few days, without any health care education or the requirements to get registered with a local medical body.

If any sort of cosmetic treatment fails, the physical results on a patient can be sharply critical and in certain cases contribute to serious psychological results, in addition to the financial burden of secondary surgery.

In accordance with a consultant plastic surgeon; “Non-surgical methods does not imply that there is not medical care taken into consideration. Treatment with injectable fillers has clear advantages but risks as well – it is not only about who can use an injection but who will have the expertise to handle any possible complicated situations”.

Non-qualified people applying filler’s injections in the wrong way, poor patient choice and insufficient regulations (allowing unconfirmed products to be applied in the UK) are a few of the key reasons why complicated situations can occur.

A latest assessment of BAAPS members disclosed a shocking figure: 69% of professional doctors found patients with complicated situations from temporary injectable fillers and about half (48%) of them found issues with short or long-term fillers. From these patients who experienced issues with long-term products, more than 8 of ten (85%) needed secondary treatment or were looked inoperable because of the injury caused.

Just after the latest disgraceful event in which 50,000 British women got poor quality PIP breast implants made of industrial type filler used in beds, a survey directed by NHS Medical Director about the rulings of the cosmetic surgery was accredited.  The survey revealed that, there were just about not any rulings for non-surgical beauty treatments. He said more; "When you have a cheek implant, a calf implant or injectable filler, you have no more protection under regulation here than you have for other household products".

The report urged that all cosmetic surgery procedures must be performed only by medical experts with proper remediation if things fail.